← The writing archiveTHE ZEN ABSURDIST

August 1, 2026 · 5 MIN READ

Burn the Doctor

Accountability for Enemies, Amnesia for Allies

Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment in Senate testimony

I turned on the congressional hearing expecting government and discovered a traveling production of The Crucible sponsored by nutritional supplements, tactical sunglasses, and whatever company manufactures those tiny American flags politicians arrange behind themselves when they need the room to smell like treason. The set was exquisite: polished wood, brass nameplates, gallon jugs of purified outrage, and a semicircle of elected officials wearing the grave expressions of men who had just learned that Satan might be receiving federal grant money.

At the center of the chamber sat Dr. Anthony Fauci, an elderly physician approximately the size of a carry-on suitcase, accused by implication of personally inventing disease, China, masks, vaccines, email, and possibly the concept of indoor air. He did not look like the architect of a global conspiracy. He looked like a man who reminds the waiter that someone at the table still hasn’t received their soup. Nevertheless, the inquisitors stared at him as though he had arrived on a black goat carrying a USB drive labeled PLAGUE PLAN: FINAL VERSION 7.

“Doctor,” one congressman thundered, vibrating with the moral authority of a man who had spent the previous evening searching his own name on social media, “isn’t it true that during the pandemic you communicated with another human being?”

Fauci adjusted his glasses.

“Yes.”

The chamber erupted. Staffers dove beneath tables. Somewhere beneath the Capitol, an ancient bell began ringing. A bald eagle crashed through a stained-glass window carrying a subpoena in its talons. They had finally found the smoking gun: correspondence.

The hearing unfolded according to the sacred logic of the witch trial, where every possible response is proof of guilt. If Fauci answered yes, he confessed. If he answered no, he lied. If he attempted to explain that reality is complex, several congressmen began hissing and making the sign of the cross. If he said he could not recall a specific conversation from four years earlier, the committee treated this as evidence that the conversation had been erased from his memory by communist nanobots hidden inside a booster shot.

“Did you create the virus?”

“No.”

“So you deny creating it?”

“Yes.”

“Interesting. Why would an innocent man be so quick to deny creating a virus?”

“I was asked whether I created it.”

“Let the record show that the witness admits being asked.”

This is how the republic now pursues truth: by constructing a flaming maze of false premises and becoming suspicious when the accused declines to sprint through it soaked in gasoline. Pleading the Fifth during an actual witch trial would be denounced as an assault on transparency. “Why won’t the witch cooperate?” the villagers would demand, already stacking lumber beneath her feet. “If she has nothing to hide, why is she so concerned about being burned alive?”

Yet ask one of the inquisitors’ own officials the simplest factual question available to the human nervous system—“Who won the 2020 presidential election?”—and suddenly the witness transforms into a fog bank wearing a necktie.

“Well, the electoral process produced a series of state-level certifications conducted according to procedures that were subsequently reviewed—”

Who won?

“Congress fulfilled its constitutional responsibility to count the electoral votes—”

Yes. Whose electoral votes?

“The peaceful transfer of power occurred on January 20, 2021—”

To whom?

At this point, the witness begins speaking in a dialect known only to hostage negotiators and malfunctioning GPS systems. The answer is Biden. Six letters. One syllable longer than “witch.” But uttering it plainly has apparently become a forbidden incantation capable of opening a portal beneath Mar-a-Lago and releasing the Great Orange Elder God from his banquet hall.

This is the theology of the modern congressional hearing: an eighty-year-old doctor must remember every email, meeting, phone call, footnote, recommendation, lunch order, hallway conversation, facial twitch, and atmospheric disturbance associated with a global pandemic. But a person seeking authority over the federal government cannot reasonably be expected to identify the winner of a publicly conducted election whose result was certified, counted, litigated, televised, inaugurated, and then lived through by the entire country.

The accused witch must answer everything. The torchbearer may answer nothing.

Refusal from the accused is guilt. Refusal from the powerful is nuance. Fauci saying, “I reject the premise of that question,” is treated as a confession written in goat blood. An election denier saying, “I prefer to focus on the future,” is praised as disciplined messaging, as though the past were an embarrassing bodily function that occurred behind a closed door and should not be discussed in polite company.

The hypocrisy would be less disturbing if it were hidden. It is not hidden. It is mounted on wheels, covered in sequins, and driven through the Capitol rotunda by a marching band. These people do not merely contradict themselves; they climb inside the contradiction, install leather seating, and drive it to a cable-news studio.

Congress has achieved a state beyond shame. Shame requires friction between one’s behavior and one’s principles, but principles have been removed from the machinery. Accountability is now a ceremonial cattle prod. You jab it into enemies while explaining that allies must not be distracted by divisive questions such as “What happened?” or “Is that true?” or “Why is your lawyer fleeing through a parking garage?”

The hearing is not designed to discover facts. Facts are dangerous because they may refuse to wear the correct jersey. The purpose is to manufacture a reusable emotional clip: a congressman points, the witness frowns, dramatic music appears online, and millions of viewers receive a fresh pellet of ideological nutrition. No information has entered the system, but the audience feels briefly full.

That is what makes the spectacle more than ordinary stupidity. The audience can see the ropes, the trapdoors, the cue cards, the exhausted stagehand rolling the cauldron into position. They know the witch trial is community theater. They can see that the flames are powered by a propane tank labeled CAMPAIGN FUND. They applaud anyway because the witch has been assigned to the opposing team.

And so the republic staggers onward, wearing a powdered wig over a Bluetooth headset, demanding complete transparency from the man tied to the stake while refusing to identify the person who became president. The inquisitors raise their torches. The witness invokes constitutional procedure. The audience purchases commemorative mugs.

Subscribe now

Another morning. Another piece.

Get the next one by email ↗Originally published on Substack ↗